A and B were married to each other in community of property. Whilst married, the parties purchased a property subject to obtaining approval from the Bank.
A few years later, B instituted divorce proceedings against A. The two entered into a settlement agreement, which was made an Order of Court.
The terms of the said agreement were as follows:
A vacated the property. B could no longer afford the monthly instalments. The amount in arrears was R 76 231.90 (Seventy Six Thousand Two Hundred and Thirty One Rand and Ninety Cents).
The Bank issued summons against A and B. A defended the matter and raised the following as a defence:
After the plea was filed, the Bank brought an application for summary judgement.
The basis of the above application was the following;
The Court found that the Bank complied with section 129 of the NCA and that the finding of the Ombudsman was in line with the law.
What does Res inter alios acta mean?
This common law doctrine, as applied to contracts, means that the rights of a person who is not a party to the contract cannot be adversely affected.
Do not forget that when you enter into a settlement agreement with your former spouse, you are not automatically absolved from liability, unless your former spouse applies for a substitution and obtains consent from the Bank.
Get in touch with us to discuss how we can help you with your challenges