Home
/
Our Insights
/
Article Detail
/
Home
/
Home
|
Login
Our Team
Our Expertise
Our Insights
BOOK CONSULTATION
SUBSCRIBE
Our Team
Our Expertise
Our Insights
You can share this article in the following networks2:
Why the decisions of our courts establish our law
07 June 2018
490
“A friend of mine is studying law and he once mentioned that our courts must always look at previous court decisions when considering a matter and in this way our courts also create law. I find that quite strange as I always thought we had existing laws that our courts must only apply. Can our courts really also create law?”
Firstly, your friend is right. Our courts do create law, but not necessarily in the way that you understand our Government to do so through the passing of legislation. Our courts rather do so through the interpretation of our legislation and applying and developing our common law rules.
Our courts are governed by a principle known by its Latin term “stare decisis” which essentially means “to stand by a prior decision.” For our courts, this principle means that a court must follow or stand by a prior court decision of higher authority, unless that decision is clearly wrong. Our courts must therefore rely on the decisions taken by courts of a higher jurisdiction or of the same jurisdiction to them in respect of similar facts or legal questions. For example, a High Court must follow the prior decision of our Supreme Court of Appeal or Constitutional Court or even of a High Court in the same jurisdiction as it in matters with the same facts or questions of law. In this way, ‘new law’ is essentially created by our courts as these prior decisions must be followed. Decisions can be referenced and researched in recorded law reports containing our court judgments, thereby contributing to an environment of legal certainty and consistency, very necessary to a country which prides itself on the importance of the rule of law.
This does not however mean that previous decisions are absolute and can never be changed. The law is and must also be organic and change with the times and this demands that previous decisions can and must be changed from time to time, albeit not willy nilly.
For a previous decision to be overturned however, the previous decision must be seen to cause injustice or be inefficient or difficult to implement. Likewise if there has been new legal development (such as new legislation) or a previous decision appears to be unconstitutional, a previous decision can be overturned. But, until a court is satisfied that the previous decision is wrong, the principle of stare decisis holds that a court cannot overturn a previous decision. A lower court can also not overturn the decision of a higher court, to again provide consistency and avoid arbitrariness in our law.
The principle of
stare decisis
is therefore vital to our law and creates consistency and transparency in our legal system. At the same time our law has enough ability to evolve so that our law can remain relevant as our society grows and places new demands on our legal system.
Previous
Directors duties towards the company they serve
Next
What print or font is too small for a contract?
Tags:
Court
,
Law
,
Litigation
Share:
Talk to us
Get in touch with us to discuss how we can help you with your challenges
Get in touch
Related Insights
Small Credit Agreements - What are they and what interest can be charged
Debt Collection
Default Judgment? What should I do to clear my Credit Record?
Popular Insights
Dont' lose your Title Deed
Does your husband’s Nyatsi qualify to be a beneficiary in terms of Section 37C of the Pension Fund Act?
Who inherits under a Deceased Estate when there is no Will?
Recent Insights
The purpose behind the path of law
The furtherance of justice, a historic view
Small Credit Agreements - What are they and what interest can be charged
You can share this article in the following networks:
Offices
+27 57 916 6666
Back to top